If we don't caught any bug in all build, then what we can
say -
1. Bad Coverage
2. Excellent Coding
3. Bad Testing
Answer Posted / shubhra
Hi
As per Test engineer’s opinion, there are just 0.00001%
chances when you will not find any bug in any of the builds.
In real time scenario this never happens.
However if it happens after better testing coverage and
quality then we can surely say that, the coding is excellent.
Please correct if my analysis is wrong.
Thanks.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 3 Yes | 2 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Explain what is the rule of a "test driven development"?
Mention what are the test artifacts involved in qa?
What is application binary interface (abi)?
What Winrunner framework did u use in ur organisation?
What should Development require of QA?
What is agile testing and what is the importance of agile testing?
What do you like most about Quality Assurance/Testing?
What are the key components of a test case template
What is code complete?
Can Parrto Principle be used in Quality Assurance and testing?
hey, i recently attended 2 interviews and they asked whether I used qamonitor of softsmith. any help on what it does?
Explain the benefits of destructive testing.
I have a brand for product which will be delivered as per the subscription from customers.What are all the major functionalities u will test in that case?
When do you think qa activities should start?
Tell me in which of the software testing phase is qa involved & qc not involved?