What’s the main differences between exchange 5.5 and
Exchange 2000/2003
Answer Posted / muthiah nagarajan
The primary differences are...
-Exchange 2000/2003 does not have its own directory or
directory service; it uses Active Directory instead.
-Exchange 2000/2003 uses native components of Windows 2000
(namely, IIS and its SMTP, NNTP, W3SVC and other
components, Kerberos and others) for many core functions.
-SMTP is now a full peer to RPC, and is it the default
transport protocol between Exchange 2000/2003 servers.
-Exchange 2000/2003 supports Active/Active clustering and
was recently certified for Windows 2000 Datacenter/2003.
-Exchange 2000/2003 scales much higher.
-It boasts conferencing services and instant messaging.
| Is This Answer Correct ? | 27 Yes | 1 No |
Post New Answer View All Answers
Can I use exchange 2000 tools to manage exchange 2003 servers?
Why do the storage quota settings not take effect immediately?
What is ddns?
What are the new features in ms exchange 2013?
What ports does the exchange server use?
How do I activate session timeouts for owa users?
How do I remove the adc after moving all of my users to an exchange 2003 server?
Explain how many global catalog servers should I deploy?
On which operating system database availability group is supported?
What’s new in flexibility and reliability?
Explain what is the stm file?
What is the function of mailbox transport submission service?
Can I use exchange 2003 tools to manage exchange 5.5 and exchange 2000 servers?
Explain how does an exchange 5.5 site compare to an exchange 2003 routing group or administrative group?
How do I disable potions of the owa interface?