what is cavitation ?

What is the pay philosophy? 
o	Pay-for-Performance? 
o	Seniority? 
o	Pay-for-Knowledge?

In few of my interviews, the interviewers asked a question
as ' Do you have any questions to ask? ' 
First thing that came to me is 'No'.Later I realized that
this was not the right answer and I should provide an answer
that is,as apt as  the job i was going to seek at that
time.Any better answer to this query?

What did you like in your previous job?

how i should sell one mobile phone when interviewer will 
ask sell this phone to me

What will you prefer a better work enviornment or better 
salary package?

If a company X selects you there and then itself and you 
join the company, After 15 days Company Y (a bigger company 
than X) who you had earlier given an Interview asks you to 
join them, and also offer you a bigger salary and 
Incentives, What will you do?

If one always ought to act so as to produce the best 
possible circumstances, then morality is extremely 
demanding. No one could plausibly claim to have met the 
requirements of this "simple principle." . . . It would 
seem strange to punish those intending to do good by 
sentencing them to an impossible task. Also, if the 
standards of right conduct are as extreme as they seem, 
then they will preclude the personal projects that humans 
find most fulfilling.

From an analytic perspective, the potential extreme demands 
of morality are not a "problem." A theory of morality is no 
less valid simply because it asks great sacrifices. In 
fact, it is difficult to imagine what kind of constraints 
could be put on our ethical projects. Shouldn't we reflect 
on our base prejudices, and not allow them to provide 
boundaries for our moral reasoning? Thus, it is tempting to 
simply dismiss the objections to the simple principle. 
However, in Demands of Morality, Liam Murphy takes these 
objections seriously for at least two distinct reasons.

First, discussion of the simple principle provides an 
excellent vehicle for a discussion of morality in general. 
Perhaps, in a way, this is Murphy's attempt at doing 
philosophy "from the inside out.". . . Second, Murphy's 
starting point tells us about the nature of his project. 
Murphy must take seriously the collisions between moral 
philosophy and our intuitive sense of right and wrong. He 
[must do so] because his work is best interpreted as 
intended to forge moral principles from our firm beliefs, 
and not to proscribe beliefs given a set of moral 
principles.

[Murphy] argues from our considered judgments rather than 
to them. . . For example, Murphy cites our "simple but 
firmly held" beliefs as supporting the potency of the over-
demandingness objection, and nowhere in the work can one 
find a source of moral values divorced from human 
preferences.

Murphy does not tell us what set of "firm beliefs" we ought 
to have. Rather, he speaks to an audience of well-
intentioned but unorganized moral realists, and tries to 
give them principles that represent their considered moral 
judgments. Murphy starts with this base sense of right and 
wrong, but recognizes that it needs to be supplemented by 
reason where our intuitions are confused or conflicting. 
Perhaps Murphy is looking for the best interpretation of 
our convictions, the same way certain legal scholars try to 
find the best interpretation of our Constitution.

This approach has disadvantages. Primarily, Murphy's 
arguments, even if successful, do not provide the kind of 
motivating force for which moral philosophy has 
traditionally searched. His work assumes and argues in 
terms of an inner sense of morality, and his project seeks 
to deepen that sense. Of course, it is quite possible that 
the moral viewpoints of humans will not converge, and some 
humans have no moral sense at all. Thus, it is very easy 
for the moral skeptic to point out a lack of justification 
and ignore the entire work.

On the other hand, Murphy's choice of a starting point 
avoids many of the problems of moral philosophy. Justifying 
the content of moral principles and granting a motivating 
force to those principles is an extraordinary task. It 
would be unrealistic to expect all discussions of moral 
philosophy to derive such justifications. Projects that 
attempt such a derivation have value, but they are hard 
pressed to produce logical consequences for everyday life. 
In the end, Murphy's strategy may have more practical 
effect than its first-principle counterparts, which do not 
seem any more likely to convince those that would reject 
Murphy's premises.
1)	The author suggests that the application of 
Murphy's philosophy to the situations of two different 
groups:

a)	would help to solve the problems of one group but 
not of the other.
b)	could result in the derivation of two radically 
different moral principles.
c)	would be contingent on the two groups sharing the 
same fundamental beliefs.
d)	could reconcile any differences between the two 
groups.

2)	Suppose an individual who firmly believes in 
keeping promises has promised to return a weapon to a 
person she knows to be extremely dangerous. According to 
Murphy, which of the following, if true, would WEAKEN the 
notion that she should return the weapon?

a)	She also firmly believes that it is morally wrong 
to assist in any way in a potentially violent act.
b)	She believes herself to be well-intentioned in 
matters of right and wrong.
c)	The belief that one should keep promises is shared 
by most members of her community.
d)	She derived her moral beliefs from first-principle 
ethical philosophy.

3)	The passage implies that a moral principle derived 
from applying Murphy's philosophy to a particular group 
would be applicable to another group if:

a)	the first group recommended the principle to the 
second group.
b)	the moral viewpoints of the two groups do not 
converge.
c)	the members of the second group have no firmly held 
beliefs.
d)	the second group shares the same fundamental 
beliefs as the first group.

4)	According to the passage, the existence of 
individuals who entirely lack a moral sense:

a)	confirms the notion that moral principles should be 
derived from the considered judgments of individuals.
b)	suggests a potential disadvantage of Murphy's 
philosophical approach.
c)	supports Murphy's belief that reason is necessary 
in cases in which intuitions are conflicting or confused.
d)	proves that first-principle strategies of ethical 
theorizing will have no more influence over the behavior of 
individuals than will Murphy's philosophical approach.

5)	Which of the following can be inferred about "doing 
philosophy from the inside out?"

a)	Murphy was the first philosopher to employ such an 
approach.
b)	It allows no place for rational argument in the 
formation of ethical principles.
c)	It is fundamentally different from the practice of 
first-principle philosophy.
d)	It is designed to dismiss objections to the "simple 
principle."

6)	A school board is debating whether or not to 
institute a dress code for the school's students. According 
to Murphy, the best way to come to an ethical decision 
would be to:

a)	consult the fundamental beliefs of the board 
members.
b)	analyze the results of dress codes instituted at 
other schools.
c)	survey the students as to whether or not they would 
prefer a dress code.
d)	determine whether or note a dress code has ever 
been instituted in the school's history.